Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRiddle, Mark S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorConnor, Bradley A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBeeching, Nicholasen_US
dc.contributor.authorDupont, Herbert L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHamer, Davidson H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKozarsky, Phyllisen_US
dc.contributor.authorLibman, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteffen, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorTribble, David R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVila, Jordien_US
dc.contributor.authorZanger, Phillipen_US
dc.contributor.authorEricsson, Charles D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-30T19:45:49Z
dc.date.available2018-08-30T19:45:49Z
dc.date.copyright2017-04
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.identifier.citationMark S. Riddle, Bradley A. Connor, Nicholas J. Beeching, Herbert L. DuPont, Davidson H. Hamer, Phyllis Kozarsky, Michael Libman, Robert Steffen, David Taylor, David R. Tribble, Jordi Vila, Philipp Zanger, Charles D. Ericsson; Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of travelers’ diarrhea: a graded expert panel report, Journal of Travel Medicine, Volume 24, Issue suppl_1, 1 April 2017, Pages S63–S80, https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/tax026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2144/31138
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Travelers' diarrhea causes significant morbidity including some sequelae, lost travel time and opportunity cost to both travelers and countries receiving travelers. Effective prevention and treatment are needed to reduce these negative impacts. METHODS: This critical appraisal of the literature and expert consensus guideline development effort asked several key questions related to antibiotic and non-antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment, utility of available diagnostics, impact of multi-drug resistant (MDR) colonization associated with travel and travelers' diarrhea, and how our understanding of the gastrointestinal microbiome should influence current practice and future research. Studies related to these key clinical areas were assessed for relevance and quality. Based on this critical appraisal, guidelines were developed and voted on using current standards for clinical guideline development methodology. RESULTS: New definitions for severity of travelers' diarrhea were developed. A total of 20 graded recommendations on the topics of prophylaxis, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up were developed. In addition, three non-graded consensus-based statements were adopted. CONCLUSION: Prevention and treatment of travelers' diarrhea requires action at the provider, traveler and research community levels. Strong evidence supports the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy in most cases of moderate to severe travelers' diarrhea, while either increasing intake of fluids only or loperamide or bismuth subsalicylate may suffice for most cases of mild diarrhea. Further studies are needed to address knowledge gaps regarding optimal therapies, the individual, community and global health risks of MDR acquisition, manipulation of the microbiome in prevention and treatment and the utility of laboratory testing in returning travelers with persistent diarrhea.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Travel Medicineen_US
dc.rightsThis work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.en_US
dc.subjectTravelers' diarrheaen_US
dc.subjectTravel medicineen_US
dc.subjectProphylaxis and treatmenten_US
dc.titleGuidelines for the prevention and treatment of travelers’ diarrhea: a graded expert panel reporten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jtm/tax026


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record